BOTTOM
LINE:
Despite some riveting
performances from both Meryl Streep and Philip Seymour Hoffman,
this screen translation of the stage play of the same name barely
registers as a film experience, with a slow pace, boring and static
visuals, at-times melodramatic direction and a lack of strong narrative
flow or tension.
THE GOOD:
“Doubt” starts off with an intriguing premise
and story, centred on a battle of wills between old-fashioned and
strict school principal Sister Aloysius (a commanding Meryl Streep)
and the more free-thinking parish priest Father Flynn (an equally
strong Philip Seymour Hoffman) set against the backdrop of a Catholic
School with the former becoming increasingly suspicious of the latter’s
close relationship with a black altar boy. The biggest strength
of this film lies in its casting; scenes where Streep and Hoffman
go at it are riveting to say the least. In line with the film’s
title, director John Patrick Shanley manages to keep doubt in your
mind throughout the entire film (and even in the end) as to what
Flynn was really up to, or if Sister Aloysius was too harsh and
jumped to the wrong conclusions. There is a true back and forth
in position for both of these characters; at times Sister Aloysius
seems overbearing and out of date in her thinking, but slowly becomes
vindicated throughout the process. Father Flynn seems like a man
ahead of his time with his views on changing the traditional positions
of the Church, but who seemingly crosses the line with inappropriate
behaviour. It would be worth noting that Amy Adams puts in a strong
supporting performance as Sister James, the innocent newcomer who
ultimately believes in Flynn’s innocence but does not want
to acknowledge the nastier possibilities as they are too uncomfortable
to deal with. Her character changes from a meek child-like innocent
to a strong-willed adult, particularly when she takes some of Sister
Aloysius advice and techniques to discipline her students. “Doubt”
has a strong story at its heart, and with one exception in the final
scene of the film, is held aloft by its commanding cast who deliver
riveting performances.
THE
BAD: “Doubt”
is another example of a film that needed a lot more imaginative work
done on the screenplay to translate its stage origins to the format
of the silver screen. Director Shanley was also the original playwright,
and despite his best intentions, the immovable nature of the scenes
he constructs as director ultimately make it feel like a filmed staged-play.
Shots are locked down, there is hardly any movement outside of the
school in terms of locations, and the staging of the dramatic scenes
do not convey anything cinematic. Ultimately this style drags the
film down. One other unfortunate problem, and it stays with you as
it is the last scene in the film, is the poor, over-the-top handling
of the ending, with Sister Aloysius breaking down in tears and announcing
that she has doubt. Not even Streep can save this overcooked, hammy
and completely unnecessary staging of this scene. You get the point
all the way through the film; hammering it in to the audience at the
end diminishes the meaning of the film and makes it look tacky). A
director who understood the nature of filming cinematically would
have made more out of this material; in the end, “Doubt”
is a noble piece of work, just not that interesting or engaging to
watch as a film.