| Directed
by David Yates --
Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint,
Emma Watson, Jim Broadbent, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman |
BOTTOM
LINE: The sixth
film in the series continues on a darker narrative path, with a
very even and mysterious tone with glorious visuals. However, as
with the other films in this franchise, this is very light stuff
indeed story-wise, making it hard to recommend to any one looking
for a story with a bit of meat on the bone or a genuine cinematic
experience.
THE GOOD:
The Harry Potter films have become just as big a gold
mine as the novels they are based upon and “The Half Blood
Prince” continues this tradition with a much richer visual
texture, darker overtones, and a somewhat quieter and subdued tone
that is both welcome and unexpected. This time out Harry (Daniel
Radcliffe) is entrusted by Dumbledore to find out more information
about his nemesis Lord Voldemort and his connection to new wizard
teacher Professor Slughorn (Jim Broadbent), all with the unexpected
help of a text book formerly owned by the “Half-Blood Prince”.
As with the other films, the twenty odd minutes specifically devoted
to the Harry-Voldemort story line are quite fascinating, and subsequently
set up a rather interesting climax to come in subsequent films.
All round, the recurring cast are becoming rather good in their
roles. Radcliffe looks quite comfortable as Harry, much more assured
and confident as he has ever been in the role. Grint and Watson
are likewise as strong, as are the entire supporting cast. The film
is quieter, taking on a more sombre tone and has a moment or two
that could be classified as scary; the cursed female student frozen
in mid-air by an evil force certainly sends tingles down your spine.
The film looks absolutely glorious visually, and is perhaps the
first of the films to not look overly CG-ish and more natural. The
appeal of these films is certainly for kids, although adults do
enjoy them as well and on this front, this new Harry Potter film
works.
THE
BAD: The story is very light
for a feature film. Not having read the books I cannot say if scenes
have been omitted or not, but my general impression of this film,
and the others before it, is that they have about a 20-30 minute section
which holds the meat of the story (which is actually quite interesting),
and the rest of it is devoted to the uninteresting teenage games played
between the characters and the requisite and boring Quidditch match.
As a result, unless you are really in to this stuff, there is hardly
any meat on the story-bone. Despite the immaculate attention to visual
detail and the overall good execution of performance, direction and
editing, the base material barely qualifies as a cinematic experience.
Harry Potter fans will probably be up in arms over this analysis,
particularly given its appeal, but not every one is a fan.
|