|
Directed
by David Yates
-- Starring
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Jim
Broadbent, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman |
BOTTOM
LINE:
The sixth film in the
series continues on a darker narrative path, with a very even and
mysterious tone with glorious visuals. However, as with the other
films in this franchise, this is very light stuff indeed story-wise,
making it hard to recommend to any one looking for a story with
a bit of meat on the bone or a genuine cinematic experience.
THE
GOOD: The Harry
Potter films have become just as big a gold mine as the novels they
are based upon and “The Half Blood Prince” continues
this tradition with a much richer visual texture, darker overtones,
and a somewhat quieter and subdued tone that is both welcome and
unexpected. This time out Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) is entrusted
by Dumbledore to find out more information about his nemesis Lord
Voldemort and his connection to new wizard teacher Professor Slughorn
(Jim Broadbent), all with the unexpected help of a text book formerly
owned by the “Half-Blood Prince”. As with the other
films, the twenty odd minutes specifically devoted to the Harry-Voldemort
story line are quite fascinating, and subsequently set up a rather
interesting climax to come in subsequent films. All round, the recurring
cast are becoming rather good in their roles. Radcliffe looks quite
comfortable as Harry, much more assured and confident as he has
ever been in the role. Grint and Watson are likewise as strong,
as are the entire supporting cast. The film is quieter, taking on
a more sombre tone and has a moment or two that could be classified
as scary; the cursed female student frozen in mid-air by an evil
force certainly sends tingles down your spine. The film looks absolutely
glorious visually, and is perhaps the first of the films to not
look overly CG-ish and more natural. The appeal of these films is
certainly for kids, although adults do enjoy them as well and on
this front, this new Harry Potter film works.
THE
BAD: The story is
very light for a feature film. Not having read the books I cannot
say if scenes have been omitted or not, but my general impression
of this film, and the others before it, is that they have about a
20-30 minute section which holds the meat of the story (which is actually
quite interesting), and the rest of it is devoted to the uninteresting
teenage games played between the characters and the requisite and
boring Quidditch match. As a result, unless you are really in to this
stuff, there is hardly any meat on the story-bone. Despite the immaculate
attention to visual detail and the overall good execution of performance,
direction and editing, the base material barely qualifies as a cinematic
experience. Harry Potter fans will probably be up in arms over this
analysis, particularly given its appeal, but not every one is a fan.
|