BOTTOM
LINE:
Sporting
a visually slick look with great production values, “Surrogates”
proves to be an otherwise dull, directionless and muddled affair,
echoing previous films of the genre such as “Total Recall”,
“I, Robot” and “Blade Runner” despite a
premise that could have made for a unique film.
THE
GOOD: “Surrogates”
starts with the fascinating premise of humans using robot automatons
to carry out the functions of every day life through an interface
in to the brain. Humans no longer have to leave the house, jacked
in to their surrogate who does all the physical work for them. Humanity
hails the end of crime, disease and other pitfalls of life, but
in doing so, begins to lose touch with itself. Enter homicide detective
Tom Greer (Bruce Willis) who along with his partner Jennifer Peters
(Radha Mitchell), are called in to investigate the death of a man
via an overload from a weapon fired at his surrogate. When they
discover that this weapon has the power to not only destroy surrogates
but also their human hosts, they are thrown in to a web of treachery
that takes them all the way to the inventor of surrogates “Canter”
(James Cromwell). Using this futuristic premise and backdrop, director
Jonathan Mostow manages to create a visually impressive film with
a number of fantastically rich images. Much detail has also gone
in to the creation of the surrogates, with each actor playing a
surrogate looking noticeably plastic and unreal; Bruce Willis looks
particularly strange in this make-up, although you may have to get
past his odd haircut first. The film does cover themes of humanity’s
loss to machinery and technology, with the film suggesting in the
end that the only way we can re-discover ourselves is to pull the
plug on all this wonderful technology we keep inventing and creating.
The film has a handful of decent action scenes. “Surrogates”
poses some interesting questions and does manage to introduce a
fascinating idea at its core.