BOTTOM LINE: Fun and watchable, and a distinct improvement over the dismal third entry in the franchise, “Shrek Forever After” does however create a sense of lethargy that would suggest that it is more than appropriate that this is the last instalment in the franchise.

THE GOOD: Having mined the ironic take on the ‘happily ever after’ fairy tale in the first three films, this fourth film makes the smart move of introducing the character of Rumpelstiltskin as the chief antagonist and through his crafty dealings, creates an alternate universe in which Shrek never saved Fiona. Free from the constraints of the established characters and setup, except for Shrek who does the deal with Rumpelstiltskin to return to how things were before meeting Fiona, the film manages to introduce some fresh elements, with both Donkey and Puss In Boots being the main beneficiaries in terms of change. Fiona is great too as the ogre rebel leader, while Rumpelstiltskin is a good, snarky antagonist. The film is quite fun in many places, and its premise allows it to be more interesting in some sense than the previous two films in the franchise (although the second film is much better executed than this one). “Shrek Forever After” is a huge improvement on the lacklustre third film, largely thanks to its alternate universe take and portrayal of its core characters in a new light.

THE BAD: You cannot help but feel a sense of lethargy when watching this film. Although the premise of this entry allows for some fresh elements to be introduced, there is still a feeling that Shrek has been there and done that, and you know that he will ultimately make things right. Any one hoping for a return to the witty banter and energy of the first film are likely to be disappointed. Also, there is absolutely no reason for this film to be in 3D; it is yet another example of Hollywood mining the higher ticket prices for a better financial result. The picture was dark and did not utilise the 3D gimmick in any meaningful way. “Shrek Forever After” is best left for home viewing, where the cost is undoubtedly cheaper.