BOTTOM
LINE:
In
the words of Homer Simpson, "that was good... but not great..."
- after the highwater mark of Spider-Man
2, this new installment in the franchise jumbles too many storylines
and in the process ends up having a lot of 'good bits' but doesn't
create a satisfying 'whole' film.
THE GOOD:
This time around, a lot of the successful elements
of the second film are back; great action scenes, some cool effects,
the bad guys are effective, and Spiderman/Peter Parker is given
the exploration of his dark side as a character arc which works
reasonably well. The Sandman is spectacularly envisioned on film
- his origin scene where he tries to re-create his body out of sand
is strangely moving and flawlessly put on screen. That alone is
worth watching. The alien goo, the black Spidey suit and the creation
of Venom were a lot of fun to watch. Peter's boss at the Daily Bugle
was hilarious again, if too understated, and Bruce Campbell has
the best extended cameo playing a maitre'd who thinks he's upper
class and very French. There is a very good sense of continuity
from the previous films, and the storyline does conclude at the
end, but still leaves the door open for more of course. Peter's
ongoing tension with his best friend Harry comes to a dramatic face-off
as Harry assumes the mantle of the new Goblin, giving their conflict
an added depth not usually found in a superhero film. The film is
fun and doesn't really drag, packing in a lot of exciting visuals
and enthralling action sequences to keep you interested throughout.
THE BAD:
I've never really been in to
Spider-Man: I didn't really get in to the first film because to
me it was basically a re-run of the first Superman film but with
certain particulars changed and didn't offer anything new. I am
also not a Tobey Maguire fan; he just doesn't have any presence
for me as a superhero and still doesn't. Spider-Man 2 defined Spiderman
for me in contrast to the other superheroes; it had a solid story,
an interesting direction for the main character doubting his role
as the hero, and a very strong villian, and was highly entertaining
despite Tobey's stilted acting. Since Part 2 was great, I looked
forward to this installmant but found it lacking. This time around,
it's overkill. They have too many villians, too many storylines,
too many characters, and as a result, each storyline is glossed
over rather than being given time to develop. Each story on its
own would have been great if focused on properly, but just when
one storyline gets started, the film cuts to another story, and
then another, and then another. In short, they needed one less villain,
and in my opinion, the Sandman, although spectacularly realised
on film, should have been cut altogether as his storyline and the
way his character ties in to Peter Parker's past seemed very arbitrary
and unnatural. Venom was cool and was integrated in to the story
a lot better but he actually doesn't show up until the last third
of the film and even when he does, they don't leave him with his
Venom face, it always crawls back to the actor's face! And Kirsten
had nothing to do but sulk in this film - not good. And don't get
me started on Peter Parker as the bad boy firing his gun-fingers
at cute girls walking past. Again, not good.